WRF V4.1.2 release

Any miscellaneous question/problem/comment related to WRF support that does not fit under any of the other category
Post Reply
Xun_Wang
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:53 am

WRF V4.1.2 release

Post by Xun_Wang » Wed Jul 17, 2019 8:11 am

Hi,

In the WRF Version 4.1.2 release there is a bug fix in temperature and winds computation when the “traditional fields” diagnostics option is turned on.

What is the “traditional fields” diagnostics option? Which namelist option is that?

Thanks for your help!

Best regards,
Xun

kwerner
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:21 pm

Re: WRF V4.1.2 release

Post by kwerner » Thu Jul 18, 2019 5:12 pm

Xun,
That is a good question, as this doesn't seem to be mentioned in the Users' Guide yet. Here is a description of this option (which can also be found in WRF/run/README.namelist):

Traditional / full fields model output

The ARW WRF model output may be modified at run-time to also include a stream that contains
more traditional fields: temperature, pressure, geopotential height, etc. The flag needs to
be activated in the namelist (diag_nwp2 = 1). In the registry.trad_fields, the output stream
is "h1", so that stream needs to be explicitly requested in the namelist.input file.

&diags
diag_nwp2 = 1
/

&time_control
io_form_auxhist1 = 2
auxhist1_interval = 180, 30, 30,
frames_per_auxhist1 = 1, 1, 1,
auxhist1_outname = "wrf_trad_fields_d<domain>_<date>"
/
NCAR/MMM

Xun_Wang
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:53 am

Re: WRF V4.1.2 release

Post by Xun_Wang » Mon Jul 29, 2019 7:29 am

Hi,

thanks for your reply and explanation!

Does that mean if I didn't turn on the diag_nwp2 option, then the simulated temperature and wind were correct and not affected by this bug fix?

Best regards,
Xun

kwerner
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:21 pm

Re: WRF V4.1.2 release

Post by kwerner » Tue Jul 30, 2019 7:19 pm

Yes, that is correct.
NCAR/MMM

Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”