Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

problems running convert_emiss.exe in WRF CHEM version 4.1.3

This post was from a previous version of the WRF&MPAS-A Support Forum. New replies have been disabled and if you have follow up questions related to this post, then please start a new thread from the forum home page.

isilda

New member
Good afternoon,
I am trying to simulate with the WRF-CHEM V4.1.3 model, and during the convert_emiss.exe process the simulation stops and I get the error:
"forrtl: severe (67): input statement requires too much data, unit 91, file /mnt/porao/GEMAC/isilda/WRFCHEM4.0/WRF/test/em_real/wrfem_00to12z_d01".
I am using emission data from EMEP and converting it to binary through an adaptation of the emisurf preprocessor used in CHIMERE. It worked well for WRFCHEM3.6.1 but now does not work for v4.
In my error log of the simulation output I have the following messages:
“”””
INPUT LandUse = "USGS"
LANDUSE TYPE = "USGS" FOUND 33 CATEGORIES 2 SEASONS WATER CATEGORY = 16 SNOW CATEGORY = 24
INITIALIZE THREE Noah LSM RELATED TABLES
LANDUSE TYPE = USGS FOUND 27 CATEGORIES
INPUT SOIL TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION = STAS
SOIL TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION = STAS FOUND 19 CATEGORIES
Sample of Urban settings
TSURFACE0_URB 285.9635
TDEEP0_URB 289,3030
IVGTYP 1
TR_URB2D 285.9635
TB_URB2D 285.9635
TG_URB2D 285.9635
TC_URB2D 285.9635
QC_URB2D 9.9999998E-03
XXXR_URB2D 0.0000000E + 00
SH_URB2D 0.0000000E + 00
LH_URB2D 0.0000000E + 00
G_URB2D 0.0000000E + 00
RN_URB2D 0.0000000E + 00
TS_URB2D 285.9635
LF_AC_URB3D 0.0000000E + 00
SF_AC_URB3D 0.0000000E + 00
CM_AC_URB3D 0.0000000E + 00
SFVENT_URB3D 0.0000000E + 00
LFVENT_URB3D 0.0000000E + 00
FRC_URB2D 0.9000000
UTYPE_URB2D 2
I 27J 30
num_urban_hi 15
Total analysis times to input = 25
Total number of times to input = 25 25
Number of emissions: 31
EMISSIONS INPUT FILE TIME PERIOD (GMT): 0 TO 1
dims: 1 1 1
dims: 179 35 154 9
dims: 1 1 1
dims: 179 35 154
dims: 190 9 165 43 3
dims: 180 9 155
forrtl: severe (67): input statement requires too much data, unit 91, file /mnt/porao/GEMAC/isilda/WRFCHEM4.0/WRF/test/em_real/wrfem_00to12z_d01
Image PC Routine Line Source
convert_emiss.exe 0000000003C7FC80 Unknown Unknown Unknown
convert_emiss.exe 0000000003C7D565 Unknown Unknown Unknown
convert_emiss.exe 0000000000461902 Unknown Unknown Unknown
convert_emiss.exe 000000000040F206 Unknown Unknown Unknown
libc.so.6 00002AAF26B46495 Unknown Unknown Unknown
convert_emiss.exe 000000000040F0F9 Unknown Unknown Unknown
“”””
I am using "kemit = 9", "chem_opt = 2 (RADM2-MADE / SORGAM)", "io_style_emissions = 2", "emiss_inpt_opt = 1", "chem_conv_tr = 1", "cu_diag = 1" and "cu_rad_feedback = .true. "
I am using data from EMEP and I did a comparison with this data set with data need from the chemistry mechanism (chem_opt = 2) I had the perception that I only used from EMEP realize, 13 species, namely, SO2 NO2 NO NH3 CO H2SO4_fin ALKE1 ALKE2 ALKE3 HCHO KET UNIDEN. When I search in wrfchem output data from convert_emiss.exe of WRFCHEM version 3.6.1, the result of assimilation of these 13 species and biochemical data I see in the file a set of values of:
SO2, NO, NO2, CO, ETH, HC3, HC5, HC8, XYL, 0L2, OLT, OLI, TOL, HCHO, ALD, KET, ORA2, NH3, PM25I, PM25J, PM_10, SO4I, SO4J
And a set of zero values in this species:
ISO, CSL, ECI, ECJ, ORGY, ORGJ, NO3I, NO3J, NAAI, ORGI_A, ORGJ_A, ORGI_BB, ORGJ_BB
Then I open the file wrfbiochemi_d01 and I see a set of values of this species: MSEBIO_ISOP.
I did an internet search for someone who had already this error, but I found nothing. So I decided to write to the forum to see if you could help me understand where the error comes from since I use the same EMEP chemical species and using the same chem_opt = 2 in version 3.6.1 (same namelist parametrizations) and the simulations ran well, and now with version 4.1.3, I have this error with the phrase "input statement requires too much data".
I thank anyone who can enlighten me.
My best regards,
Isilda
 
Top