Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

GREENFRAC

ghuan

New member
I want to examine the impact of changes in vegetation cover on the study area, so I replaced the GREENFRAC parameter in geo_em_d03. I have confirmed that the replacement was successful and that there is a significant difference compared to the default values, as shown in the figure below.
greenfrac_default.png
greenfrac_fvc.png
After replacing the parameter, I re-ran metgrid, real, and wrf. However, the results from the two simulations are exactly the same (using T2 as an example). I would like to know how to ensure that the modified GREENFRAC actually takes effect. My namelist file is as follows.
 

Attachments

  • namelist.input
    4 KB · Views: 3
  • namelist.wps
    793 bytes · Views: 1
I want to examine the impact of changes in vegetation cover on the study area, so I replaced the GREENFRAC parameter in geo_em_d03. I have confirmed that the replacement was successful and that there is a significant difference compared to the default values, as shown in the figure below.
View attachment 17998
View attachment 17999
After replacing the parameter, I re-ran metgrid, real, and wrf. However, the results from the two simulations are exactly the same (using T2 as an example). I would like to know how to ensure that the modified GREENFRAC actually takes effect. My namelist file is as follows.
what is your dynamic vegetation option?
 
Top