struggling_phd
New member
Dear community,
I am Leo, and I am currently a PhD student at University of Houston and I am a part of the environmental fluid mechanics lab (..:: Environmental Fluid Mechanics Lab at UH ::..). Currently I am working on a project with WRF-CHEM application within Urban Area (Houston).
After the initial struggle, I was able to successfully run multiple WRF-CHEM simulations over the domain I am investigating. The meteorological outputs are very good, telling me that the model is configured well. (I've checked winds, temperature and am on my way to check relative humidity.) However, the problem is with ozone and PM2.5 results.
I am using WRF/CHEM 4.2.2.
Please take a look at the screenshot I've attached. I cannot reason out why are some months so under predicted by the model regarding the ozone, and then again why are some months so over-predicting for pm 2.5.
For the anthropogenic emissions, I am using the anthro_emiss utility with edgar_htap_2010_0.1x0.1 data,
For bioemiss it's megan
for BC I use mozbc with the attached .inp file.
I am also attaching my namelist to run the sim, as well as the input file for mozbc, and some time-series of ozone, pm25 and CO.
Any kind of tips / suggestions would be appreciated!
Thanks!
I am Leo, and I am currently a PhD student at University of Houston and I am a part of the environmental fluid mechanics lab (..:: Environmental Fluid Mechanics Lab at UH ::..). Currently I am working on a project with WRF-CHEM application within Urban Area (Houston).
After the initial struggle, I was able to successfully run multiple WRF-CHEM simulations over the domain I am investigating. The meteorological outputs are very good, telling me that the model is configured well. (I've checked winds, temperature and am on my way to check relative humidity.) However, the problem is with ozone and PM2.5 results.
I am using WRF/CHEM 4.2.2.
Please take a look at the screenshot I've attached. I cannot reason out why are some months so under predicted by the model regarding the ozone, and then again why are some months so over-predicting for pm 2.5.
For the anthropogenic emissions, I am using the anthro_emiss utility with edgar_htap_2010_0.1x0.1 data,
For bioemiss it's megan
for BC I use mozbc with the attached .inp file.
I am also attaching my namelist to run the sim, as well as the input file for mozbc, and some time-series of ozone, pm25 and CO.
Any kind of tips / suggestions would be appreciated!
Thanks!
Attachments
-
Screen Shot 2023-03-13 at 5.35.24 PM.png261.9 KB · Views: 42
-
Screen Shot 2023-03-13 at 5.35.45 PM.png244.3 KB · Views: 36
-
Screen Shot 2023-03-13 at 2.53.30 PM.png278.1 KB · Views: 29
-
namelist.input7.1 KB · Views: 30
-
Screen Shot 2023-03-13 at 2.51.46 PM.png203.6 KB · Views: 37
-
mozbc_inp_for_my_chem.txt1.2 KB · Views: 32