Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

negative values for RAINC

This post was from a previous version of the WRF&MPAS-A Support Forum. New replies have been disabled and if you have follow up questions related to this post, then please start a new thread from the forum home page.

Hi everybody,
I hope you are doing great.
May I ask your idea about negative values for RAINC in WRF outputs? I've seen this link "" and found similar problem. I might continue at that page, however my physics is different. Also, I've seen similar problem at this page "".
I've attached namelist.input and our WRF version is under 4 (I'm not sure which version of 3, I only use WRF outputs!). Schemes have been used are Lin et al. scheme (mp_physics), Eta similarity (sf_sfclay_physics), Noah Land Surface Model (sf_surface_physics).
I should mention those negative values are an order of 10^(-7) and so they are so little, but when they are summed, that could be an order of 10^(-1). So, I think these small negative values should be noticed.

I appreciate any help.
Ehsan Taghizadeh


  • namelist.input
    4.2 KB · Views: 28