Hi all,
There have a few posts on this issue, but I'm in the unusual position that it seems to have been triggered by changing the land-cover specification. I've been using the same namelist.wps and namelist.input, but between yesterday and today I modified the GEOGRID.TBL file to match GEOGRID.TBL.ARW_LCZ (both versions attached; they have .txt suffixes only for upload purposes). Yesterday real.exe and wrf.exe completed as expected and I verified the final netcdf output files, but today I quickly get an error as shown in rsl.error.0000 and real.log. However, interestingly, the met_em output files produced today seem fine, so the error seems to be in real.exe specifically. To be absolutely sure nothing had changed on the cluster, I also went back and confirmed that everything still works when I punch in yesterday's settings.
What might I need to do to get real.exe and WRF to run successfully with these different geogrid parameters?
Thanks,
Colin
There have a few posts on this issue, but I'm in the unusual position that it seems to have been triggered by changing the land-cover specification. I've been using the same namelist.wps and namelist.input, but between yesterday and today I modified the GEOGRID.TBL file to match GEOGRID.TBL.ARW_LCZ (both versions attached; they have .txt suffixes only for upload purposes). Yesterday real.exe and wrf.exe completed as expected and I verified the final netcdf output files, but today I quickly get an error as shown in rsl.error.0000 and real.log. However, interestingly, the met_em output files produced today seem fine, so the error seems to be in real.exe specifically. To be absolutely sure nothing had changed on the cluster, I also went back and confirmed that everything still works when I punch in yesterday's settings.
What might I need to do to get real.exe and WRF to run successfully with these different geogrid parameters?
Thanks,
Colin