tullio_degiacomi
New member
Hi,
I am performing some simulations using the Noah-MP scheme instead of the simplest Noah scheme for the sf_surface_physics. With this parameterziation I always obtain null potential evaporation in the wrfout. Does this happen because potential evaporation is not computed in the Noah-MP scheme or are some namelist modifications needed to compute it?
In the first case, which is the best alternative to compute potential evapotranspiration with the variables written in the wrfout files?
The namelist.input is attached below.
Thanks for the attention.
I am performing some simulations using the Noah-MP scheme instead of the simplest Noah scheme for the sf_surface_physics. With this parameterziation I always obtain null potential evaporation in the wrfout. Does this happen because potential evaporation is not computed in the Noah-MP scheme or are some namelist modifications needed to compute it?
In the first case, which is the best alternative to compute potential evapotranspiration with the variables written in the wrfout files?
The namelist.input is attached below.
Thanks for the attention.