Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

QX in Latent Heat Flux Calculation

ejanzon

New member
Hi,

I am trying to reproduce the total LH calculation from SFCLAY using the WRF model output. I modified the EM_COMMON registry to have the coefficient FLQC and QSFC in the model output and now I am having trouble understanding the meaning of the variable QX. If I understand it (my FORTRAN understanding is not good, so please bear with me), the
phys/module_sf_sfclay.F code uses the 3D atmospheric mixing ratio (QV3D), separates this into single columns (QV1D), and then uses this to calculate a QX. When I try to calculate the moisture gradient using QSFC-QVAPOR over a grid cell, I get values that an order of magnitude greater than I would expect, so I think I am interpreting this the wrong way. I am also a bit confused about the height of QX above ground level. Is this the same as the first model level or the half-model level above the first model level?

So my questions are:
1) Is QVAPOR from the standard model output equivalent to QV3D?

2) Is QX taken directly at the first model level or the first half-model level above the LSM?
 
Please see my answers below:

Hi,

I am trying to reproduce the total LH calculation from SFCLAY using the WRF model output. I modified the EM_COMMON registry to have the coefficient FLQC and QSFC in the model output and now I am having trouble understanding the meaning of the variable QX. If I understand it (my FORTRAN understanding is not good, so please bear with me), the
phys/module_sf_sfclay.F code uses the 3D atmospheric mixing ratio (QV3D), separates this into single columns (QV1D), and then uses this to calculate a QX. When I try to calculate the moisture gradient using QSFC-QVAPOR over a grid cell, I get values that an order of magnitude greater than I would expect, so I think I am interpreting this the wrong way. I am also a bit confused about the height of QX above ground level. Is this the same as the first model level or the half-model level above the first model level?

So my questions are:
1) Is QVAPOR from the standard model output equivalent to QV3D?
yes it is
2) Is QX taken directly at the first model level or the first half-model level above the LSM?
QX is qvapor at the first half-model level.
 
Top