Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

Underestimated CLDFRA in 4.4.1 compared to 4.3.1

peterkaa

New member
Hi All,

Significant differences were found in the SWDOWN calculation between WRF-4.3.1 and WRF-4.4.1.
Compared with measured radiation data, WRF-4.4.1 shows much worse scores.

Similar differences are in CLDFRA: compared to satellite observation WRF-4.4.1 underestimates
the values of the parameter. The attached images show CLDFRA values (right: 4.3.1, left:4.4.1).
The first picture shows the 1st, and the second is the 30th vertical model level.
This feature can be found at mp_phys=8, 28, 16, and ra_sw_physics= 4.
It seems there is a problem with CLDFRA calculation regardless of the mp_phys.

Applied namelist.input is also attached.

Do you have any suggestions to solve this problem, or is it perhaps a bug?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • namelist.input
    6.8 KB · Views: 1
  • thirtieth_lvl.png
    thirtieth_lvl.png
    936.3 KB · Views: 0
  • first_lvl.png
    first_lvl.png
    1,023.1 KB · Views: 0
Top