Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

WRF runtime error: signal SIGFPE: Floating-point exception

htan2013

Member
Dear experts,

I met this SIGFPE error when running WRF4.5.1 on other HPC.
The error is shown below and attached:

Program received signal SIGFPE: Floating-point exception - erroneous arithmetic operation.

Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x155553e5f5af in ???
#1 0x155550e99f10 in ???
#2 0x155550e13406 in ???
#3 0x155550eb96c2 in ???
#4 0x155550bab2b1 in ???
#5 0x155550c66af4 in ???
#6 0x155553ac58de in ???
#7 0x155553acea68 in ???
#8 0x155553a7a7bd in ???
#9 0x155553a7d8e4 in ???
#10 0x155553a7da43 in ???
#11 0x1555554851c8 in nf_open_
at /tmp/svcbuilder/spack-stage/spack-stage-netcdf-fortran-4.6.1-pr4tuwwm3k7ookhmewxx4k4gcmbhfc7a/spack-src/fortran/nf_control.F90:189
#12 0x54abafa in ext_ncd_open_for_read_begin_
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/external/io_netcdf/wrf_io.f:1598
#13 0x54acf11 in ext_ncd_open_for_read_
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/external/io_netcdf/wrf_io.f:1505
#14 0x1c1bbcd in __module_io_MOD_wrf_open_for_read
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/frame/module_io.f90:18839
#15 0x1890657 in __module_io_domain_MOD_open_r_dataset
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/share/module_io_domain.f90:12
#16 0x1a76ded in med_initialdata_input_
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/share/mediation_wrfmain.f90:67
#17 0x40856d in __module_wrf_top_MOD_wrf_init
at ../main/module_wrf_top.f90:271
#18 0x407303 in wrf
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/main/wrf.f90:22
#19 0x40736c in main
at /lcrc/project/WRF_Future/Test_WRF_Tree/WRF/main/wrf.f90:6

Is this related to the NETCDF issue? Kindly take any suggestions to solve this issue.

Regards,
HT
 

Attachments

  • namelist.input
    6.5 KB · Views: 2
  • rsl.error.0000
    2.2 KB · Views: 1
There are a few issues in the namelist:
(1) please set dx = 4500, 1500, 500, and the same set for dy
(2) time_step = 10 is way too small for this case. Please try time_step = 27.
(3) if the model domain covers area with large topography, please increase the value of epssm from 0.1 to 0.5 or even larger
(4) You didn't set sst_update = 1, so please remove the lines below from your namelist:
auxinput4_inname = "wrflowinp_d<domain>"
auxinput4_interval = 180
io_form_auxinput4 = 2

Please change above options and try again.
 
Top