Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

WRFDA 3DVar cycle assimilation of PM2.5 and PM10 seems to have restarted at the second moment

lirui111

New member
Hello everyone:
When I was working on the cycle mode of WRFDA, I conducted data assimilation at 0:00, 6:00, 12:00, and 18:00 respectively. I found that after completing the assimilation at 6:00 and linking to the WRF running directory, the namelist should be integrated from 6:00 to 12:00. However, the output of the results did not seem to be affected by the assimilation of wrfinput. I compared the mode results after updating the lower boundary, DA running, and latral boundary, and found no problems.
Why is there such a significant difference in the output results of the mode when running the second time?
Originally, the PM2.5 concentration was highest at 75ug/m3, but now it is only about 0.4 at 6:00
As you can see, there is no problem with updating the lower boundary and completing the DA, but once converted to WRF, PM2.5 and PM10 will accumulate from 0 in China
 

Attachments

  • up_low_bc.png
    up_low_bc.png
    123.2 KB · Views: 9
  • da.png
    da.png
    123.7 KB · Views: 9
  • wrfout_06.png
    wrfout_06.png
    185.1 KB · Views: 7
Hello, I am currently encountering issues with simulating PM10 and PM2.5 while using WRF-Chem(V4.5) for dust simulation only. I am successfully obtaining outputs for DUST_1, DUST_2, ..., DUST_5, however, the variables for PM10 and PM2.5 simulations are all zeros. I would like to ask for your guidance on how to properly simulate these two variables. Below is my namelist configuration. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
 

Attachments

  • namelist.input
    8.5 KB · Views: 4
  • namelist.wps
    995 bytes · Views: 1
  • 微信图片_20240613142027.png
    微信图片_20240613142027.png
    39.3 KB · Views: 4
  • 微信图片_20240613142037.png
    微信图片_20240613142037.png
    37.8 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Top