Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

AHE field misalignment in official SLUCM dataset

ZHOU Wan

New member
Dear WRF support team,
I have been working with the official SLUCM anthropogenic heat emission (AHE) dataset provided on the WRF geographic data download page:Static Data Downloads
1756128833365.png
However, I encountered a puzzling issue: the AHE data appears to be severely displaced in the resulting geo_em.d01.nc file. I have tested this in two separate domain configurations centered over: Chongqing, China and Hong Kong SAR
In both cases, the AHE field shows obvious misalignment — data tiles appear to be misplaced or "jumped" to incorrect locations far from the target region. No other geographic variables (e.g., LU_INDEX, ALBEDO) show such misalignment — only AHE.
Please refer to the figures below:
AHE_D01_month_hour_11.png1756128783212.png
Is this a known issue with the official SLUCM AHE dataset (e.g., tile misalignment or indexing error)?Or is it possible that I made a mistake in my setup or usage?
I would greatly appreciate any clarification or suggestions. Thank you!


PS: namelist.wps settings in Chongqing: (Figure in QGIS with the following setting)
```namelist
&geogrid
parent_id = 1, 1, 2,
parent_grid_ratio = 1, 3, 3,
i_parent_start = 1, 81, 201,
j_parent_start = 1, 81, 201,
e_we = 307, 439, 79,
e_sn = 311, 451, 121,
dx = 9000.0,
dy = 9000.0,
map_proj = 'lambert',
ref_lon = 106.79891570499628,
ref_lat = 29.73164201861055,
truelat1 = 30.0,
truelat2 = 60.0,
stand_lon = 105.0,
geog_data_res = 'y2010_urb+y2010_ahe+cglc_modis_lcz+default',
/
```
1756129085162.png
 
Top