Running WRF with high resolution -- 300m

seti

Member
Hello everyone,

I am planning to run the WRF model over a mountainous region with a very high horizontal resolution of approximately 300 meters. Before starting the simulations, I would like to better understand the important considerations required to ensure model stability and avoid numerical problems.

In particular, I would appreciate guidance on the following points:

  • How should the physical and dynamical stability of the model be handled at such high resolution?
  • Which physics schemes are recommended for a 300 m setup in complex terrain?
  • Should cumulus parameterization be turned off completely at this resolution?
  • Which PBL, surface layer, and microphysics schemes are more suitable for convection-permitting or near-LES simulations?
  • What additional options should be activated to improve numerical stability (e.g., damping, diffusion, adaptive time step, turbulence options)?
  • Are there specific options that should be disabled to avoid instability or unrealistic behavior?
  • How important is terrain smoothing in mountainous regions at this resolution?
  • Are there any recommended settings for vertical resolution, time step, or nesting strategy?
I would also appreciate any advice based on personal experience running WRF at sub-kilometer resolution over complex terrain.

Thank you in advance for your help.
 
Hello everyone,

I am planning to run the WRF model over a mountainous region with a very high horizontal resolution of approximately 300 meters. Before starting the simulations, I would like to better understand the important considerations required to ensure model stability and avoid numerical problems.

In particular, I would appreciate guidance on the following points:

  • How should the physical and dynamical stability of the model be handled at such high resolution?
  • Which physics schemes are recommended for a 300 m setup in complex terrain?
  • Should cumulus parameterization be turned off completely at this resolution?
  • Which PBL, surface layer, and microphysics schemes are more suitable for convection-permitting or near-LES simulations?
  • What additional options should be activated to improve numerical stability (e.g., damping, diffusion, adaptive time step, turbulence options)?
  • Are there specific options that should be disabled to avoid instability or unrealistic behavior?
  • How important is terrain smoothing in mountainous regions at this resolution?
  • Are there any recommended settings for vertical resolution, time step, or nesting strategy?
I would also appreciate any advice based on personal experience running WRF at sub-kilometer resolution over complex terrain.

Thank you in advance for your help.
set epss = 0.9
 
Back
Top