Hey all, was more curious than anything if this has been the experience of anyone else.
I am running WRF-ARWv4.5.1 at a 12-km resolution over Texas (where there is plenty of complex terrain), and was using cu_physics option 1 & mp_phys option 8. I was running into a segmentation fault error (CFL violation within the rsl log files); switching both of these to newer physics options (cu_phys option 16 & mp_phys option 24) eliminated this segmentation fault error. Was wondering if others have had this experience/what kinds of convective/microphysics parameterization options to use as a general guideline when dealing with complex terrain within a model domain. Many thanks!
I am running WRF-ARWv4.5.1 at a 12-km resolution over Texas (where there is plenty of complex terrain), and was using cu_physics option 1 & mp_phys option 8. I was running into a segmentation fault error (CFL violation within the rsl log files); switching both of these to newer physics options (cu_phys option 16 & mp_phys option 24) eliminated this segmentation fault error. Was wondering if others have had this experience/what kinds of convective/microphysics parameterization options to use as a general guideline when dealing with complex terrain within a model domain. Many thanks!
Last edited: