I would like to ask your assistance for my 3D-VAR data assimilation experiment. All elements of my experiment seem ok, the log files tell appropriate work, and wrfvar_output generated correctly.
I have checked the increments (difference between first guess and 3D-VAR output file) and they also seem correct on higher level. BUT on surface level something may be wrong.
Considering T2m there is slight and singular increment field, moreover U,V fields are identical in both files (no increments), however Jo calculation for synop_u and synop_v appears in log files:
jo_synop 0.211335854820E+03
jo%synop_u 0.107599699190E+03
jo%synop_v 0.186768876058E+01
jo%synop_t 0.101610705821E+03
jo%synop_p 0.257418691903E+00
jo%synop_q 0.342357448447E-03
jo_airep 0.362222449565E+02
jo%airep_u 0.113257960778E+02
jo%airep_v 0.000000000000E+00
jo%airep_t 0.248964488787E+02
jo%airep_q 0.000000000000E+00
jo_profiler 0.346260589824E+02
jo%profiler_u 0.261924596285E+02
jo%profiler_v 0.843359935392E+01
My first idea was that surface observation assimilation results are not written out, but I did not find this option in namelists. What could be wrong?
I have put FG, namelist, and output files together:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sh70hrV1JfRt9BuD-i00vMuqQb5bWQzq/view?usp=drive_web
Thank you for your help in advance,
Péter
I have checked the increments (difference between first guess and 3D-VAR output file) and they also seem correct on higher level. BUT on surface level something may be wrong.
Considering T2m there is slight and singular increment field, moreover U,V fields are identical in both files (no increments), however Jo calculation for synop_u and synop_v appears in log files:
jo_synop 0.211335854820E+03
jo%synop_u 0.107599699190E+03
jo%synop_v 0.186768876058E+01
jo%synop_t 0.101610705821E+03
jo%synop_p 0.257418691903E+00
jo%synop_q 0.342357448447E-03
jo_airep 0.362222449565E+02
jo%airep_u 0.113257960778E+02
jo%airep_v 0.000000000000E+00
jo%airep_t 0.248964488787E+02
jo%airep_q 0.000000000000E+00
jo_profiler 0.346260589824E+02
jo%profiler_u 0.261924596285E+02
jo%profiler_v 0.843359935392E+01
My first idea was that surface observation assimilation results are not written out, but I did not find this option in namelists. What could be wrong?
I have put FG, namelist, and output files together:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sh70hrV1JfRt9BuD-i00vMuqQb5bWQzq/view?usp=drive_web
Thank you for your help in advance,
Péter