Hi all,
I have gotten different results from the same experiment using two different computers (one at TACC, and one a more ordinary work computer) and I'm trying to track down why the outcomes are so different. The only difference I can think of besides the computers themselves are the compiler options. On the TACC computer I used the ifort/icc combo one can choose from the preset configuration options. On the work machine, the model was compiled with a custom configure.wrf file using ifort and gcc, which I don't think is one of the available configuration options normally, at least not on this version of WRF (a customized version of WRF 3.5). I'm currently trying to compile the model on one of our work machines with one of the preset configuration options, but I was wondering: could it be that somehow using ifort and gcc together would give problematic model behavior, or should this be fine?
Thanks!
Ben
I have gotten different results from the same experiment using two different computers (one at TACC, and one a more ordinary work computer) and I'm trying to track down why the outcomes are so different. The only difference I can think of besides the computers themselves are the compiler options. On the TACC computer I used the ifort/icc combo one can choose from the preset configuration options. On the work machine, the model was compiled with a custom configure.wrf file using ifort and gcc, which I don't think is one of the available configuration options normally, at least not on this version of WRF (a customized version of WRF 3.5). I'm currently trying to compile the model on one of our work machines with one of the preset configuration options, but I was wondering: could it be that somehow using ifort and gcc together would give problematic model behavior, or should this be fine?
Thanks!
Ben