mid-cyclone
New member
Hi,
A question about convective heating in a 3-km domain nested within a 9-km mother domain of WRF. I turned off cumulus convection for the nested 3-km domain yet still keep cumulus convection scheme on for the 9-km domain. As expected, there is no RAINC inside the 3-km domain since the simulated results of the 3-km run would replace the original 9-km model results in the 3-km domain. However, I found that RTHCUTEN (COUPLED THETA TENDENCY DUE TO CUMULUS SCHEME) in the 9-km run with the 3-km nested domain is not zero within the 3-km domain. Is this normal? Does the 3-km run not replace the RTHCUTEN in the 3-km overlapped domain of the 9-km run? I suppose that RTHCUTEN is convective heating for the original 9-km run and should not be used as a diagnostic inside the 3-km domain, right?
A question about convective heating in a 3-km domain nested within a 9-km mother domain of WRF. I turned off cumulus convection for the nested 3-km domain yet still keep cumulus convection scheme on for the 9-km domain. As expected, there is no RAINC inside the 3-km domain since the simulated results of the 3-km run would replace the original 9-km model results in the 3-km domain. However, I found that RTHCUTEN (COUPLED THETA TENDENCY DUE TO CUMULUS SCHEME) in the 9-km run with the 3-km nested domain is not zero within the 3-km domain. Is this normal? Does the 3-km run not replace the RTHCUTEN in the 3-km overlapped domain of the 9-km run? I suppose that RTHCUTEN is convective heating for the original 9-km run and should not be used as a diagnostic inside the 3-km domain, right?