I will be using the 60_3km variable MPAS nest (having a circular transition zone) to run simulations on a case study of interest in the mid-latitudes. Using the rotate aspect of the 'grid_rotate' utility appears foolish for a grid having a circular transition zone. However, I'm wondering if the 'rotate' will actually work to rotate the underlying surface fields (e.g. topography) as I am interested in investigating the impact of topography on the simulated precipitation.