I am running a limited domain MPAS run, clipped from the 3.75 km global mesh (which I refreshed last week to get the newer soil fields). I use the convection_permitting suite, but with mp_thompson_aerosols and sf_noahmp for lsm. I noticed that urban areas quickly develop high q2, despite qflx being lower than surrounding areas. This does not occur with just sf_noah. The images below show the same forecast with noahmp and noah for Alberta, Canada. Note the cities of Calgary and Edmonton show high dewpoints (from high q2). The ivgtyp looks good, at 13 for those areas (urban/built-up). Just wondering if noahmp is still not quite so ready yet, or are there many other steps needed to get it to run well?



