Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

low mixing height in coastal zone

This post was from a previous version of the WRF&MPAS-A Support Forum. New replies have been disabled and if you have follow up questions related to this post, then please start a new thread from the forum home page.

HJORQUER

New member
Hello

I am running wrf 4.2 for a coastal domain (city and port facilities)

I get fairly low mixing heights (20-40 m above ground level) overnight at port site stations, even though I would expect higher PBLs because of the marine boundary layer influence. I do not understand what could be going on wrong.

The simulation runs on may (austral fall season)

Below I post the namefile physics section

Regards

Hector

&physics
sst_update = 1
rdlai2d = .true.
mp_physics = 3, 3, 3,
ra_lw_physics = 1, 1, 1,
ra_sw_physics = 1, 1, 1,
radt = 12, 12, 12,
sf_sfclay_physics = 1, 1, 1,
sf_surface_physics = 2, 2, 2,
bl_pbl_physics = 1, 1, 1,
ysu_topdown_pblmix = 1,
topo_wind = 1, 1, 1,
bldt = 0, 0, 0,
cu_physics = 2, 0, 0,
cu_diag = 0, 0, 0,
cudt = 0, 0, 0,
isfflx = 1,
ifsnow = 1,
icloud = 1,
surface_input_source = 1,
num_soil_layers = 4,
num_land_cat = 20,
sf_urban_physics = 0, 0, 0,
slope_rad = 1, 1, 1,
topo_shading = 1, 1, 1,
maxiens = 1,
maxens = 3,
maxens2 = 3,
maxens3 = 16,
ensdim = 144,
cu_rad_feedback = .false., .false., .false.,
mp_zero_out = 2,
mp_zero_out_thresh = 1.e-8,
/
 
Hi Ming

I am just reading the 'PBLH' variable that comes in wrfout_d0* files, this is the one I interpret as mixing height,

Regards

Hector
 
Top