Hi,
I have a question about the UU and VV fields in WRF met_em files and the U10/V10 fields in the wrfinput file. All for the same domain.
I initialized my simulation at 12 UTC, using the met_em file at the same time. As far as I understand, the very first level in UU/VV is the 10-m u and v winds (and rotated to the model grid?) from the meteorological input data (I used GFS in this case). However, when I compared the de-staggered first-level UU (so that the x-dimension is e_we-1) to the U10 field in my wrfinput file, I found they are slightly different. Same for the lowest level VV in my met_em and V10 in my wrfinput. I wonder if U10 and V10 are re-interpolated somewhere in real.exe because I had thought the wind fields should be the same.
i.e.,
destaggered UU in met_em at the lowest level = U10 in wrfinput
destaggered VV in met_em at the lowest level = V10 in wrfinput
For the 2-m temperature, both the lowest level TT in met_em and T2 in wrfinput give the same values.
David
I have a question about the UU and VV fields in WRF met_em files and the U10/V10 fields in the wrfinput file. All for the same domain.
I initialized my simulation at 12 UTC, using the met_em file at the same time. As far as I understand, the very first level in UU/VV is the 10-m u and v winds (and rotated to the model grid?) from the meteorological input data (I used GFS in this case). However, when I compared the de-staggered first-level UU (so that the x-dimension is e_we-1) to the U10 field in my wrfinput file, I found they are slightly different. Same for the lowest level VV in my met_em and V10 in my wrfinput. I wonder if U10 and V10 are re-interpolated somewhere in real.exe because I had thought the wind fields should be the same.
i.e.,
destaggered UU in met_em at the lowest level = U10 in wrfinput
destaggered VV in met_em at the lowest level = V10 in wrfinput
For the 2-m temperature, both the lowest level TT in met_em and T2 in wrfinput give the same values.
David