Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k)

seti

Member
Dear all,

I am using WRF-Chem, chem_opt 202. After a few hours of running the model, I notice this message in my rsl file:

calculate MEGAN emissions at ktau, gmtp, tmidh = 5101 17.0000000 17.0016670
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 1 10 4 0.1426E+00
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 2 7 1 0.8587E-03
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 2 10 4 0.7528E-03
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 3 10 1 0.2112E-02
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 17 9 9 3 0.8967E-03
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 17 10 9 3 0.7537E-03

photolysis_driver: called for domain 3

Why did this happen? and does it mean the simulation faces any problems?

I attached my name list and rsl file. Please advise me in this regard.

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • rsl.error.0000
    4.8 MB · Views: 0
  • namelist.input
    9.3 KB · Views: 2
Thanks for your reply, do you know why this happened, I'm not really understand the meaning of these message.
I am not sure why this happened. But below is an answer I got from a forum :

"The general advice here is to review the aerosol fields to look for erroneously large values. If those do exist, then you will need to track down the source -- which aerosol component? Is it caused by emissions (e.g. biomass burning)?

I am not sure if the version is an issue. However, you could check that too by conducting the same simulation with an earlier WRF-Chem version
."
 
I am not sure why this happened. But below is an answer I got from a forum :

"The general advice here is to review the aerosol fields to look for erroneously large values. If those do exist, then you will need to track down the source -- which aerosol component? Is it caused by emissions (e.g. biomass burning)?

I am not sure if the version is an issue. However, you could check that too by conducting the same simulation with an earlier WRF-Chem version
."
Hi Seti,
Have you solved this issue? I encountered the same one.
Thank you.
 
Top