mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k)

[seti]

Dear all,

I am using WRF-Chem, chem_opt 202. After a few hours of running the model, I notice this message in my rsl file:

calculate MEGAN emissions at ktau, gmtp, tmidh = 5101 17.0000000 17.0016670
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 1 10 4 0.1426E+00
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 2 7 1 0.8587E-03
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 2 10 4 0.7528E-03
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 16 3 10 1 0.2112E-02
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 17 9 9 3 0.8967E-03
mieaer_sc: radius_wet set to rmax,id,i,j,k,m,rm(m,k) 3 17 10 9 3 0.7537E-03
photolysis_driver: called for domain 3

Why did this happen? and does it mean the simulation faces any problems?

I attached my name list and rsl file. Please advise me in this regard.

Thank you.

 

[hui.zhong]

Hi, do you solve it? I encountered the same problem.

 

[seti]

Hi, do you solve it? I encountered the same problem.

Hi,

I faced the issue once I used more than 1 domain. Once I used only 1 domain, the issue vanished. For more than 1 domain I did not find any solution.

 

[hui.zhong]

Thanks for your reply, do you know why this happened, I'm not really understand the meaning of these message.

 

[seti]

Thanks for your reply, do you know why this happened, I'm not really understand the meaning of these message.

I am not sure why this happened. But below is an answer I got from a forum :

"The general advice here is to review the aerosol fields to look for erroneously large values. If those do exist, then you will need to track down the source -- which aerosol component? Is it caused by emissions (e.g. biomass burning)?

I am not sure if the version is an issue. However, you could check that too by conducting the same simulation with an earlier WRF-Chem version."

 

[samuel]

I am not sure why this happened. But below is an answer I got from a forum :

"The general advice here is to review the aerosol fields to look for erroneously large values. If those do exist, then you will need to track down the source -- which aerosol component? Is it caused by emissions (e.g. biomass burning)?

I am not sure if the version is an issue. However, you could check that too by conducting the same simulation with an earlier WRF-Chem version."

Hi Seti,
Have you solved this issue? I encountered the same one.
Thank you.