afernandezody
Member
Hello,
I have compiled and run WRF v4.4 with dm configuration for the last 3 days. The new netCDF-4 parallel features (https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/commit/e01862402a) worked really well (with a dm setup) as far as the few tests that these few days have permitted. However, and when I chose a dm+sm configuration, WRF compiles and runs but it doesn't output the wrfout files. When I revert io_form to 2 (instead of 13), then it works fine and outputs the wrfout files. My question is if when WRF is compiled as dm+sm, do you still need to set io_form to 13 or is there another value that needs to be used?
Thanks,
Arturo
I have compiled and run WRF v4.4 with dm configuration for the last 3 days. The new netCDF-4 parallel features (https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/commit/e01862402a) worked really well (with a dm setup) as far as the few tests that these few days have permitted. However, and when I chose a dm+sm configuration, WRF compiles and runs but it doesn't output the wrfout files. When I revert io_form to 2 (instead of 13), then it works fine and outputs the wrfout files. My question is if when WRF is compiled as dm+sm, do you still need to set io_form to 13 or is there another value that needs to be used?
Thanks,
Arturo