larissafrj
New member
Hello everyone!
I’m having a little problem with the assimilation of topographic data in wrf.
I used as reference the discussion at the topic below and the User’s Guide to assimilate SRTM and ASTER data on WRF.
https://forum.mmm.ucar.edu/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=8359&p=14133&hilit=srtm+topography#p14133
Firstly, I downloaded several GeoTiff files for the region of my interest and merged these files using python gdal.
> gdal_merge.py -init 255 -o saida.tif carta1.tif carta2.tif carta3.tif [… até a] cartaN.tif
Then, I used the convertgeotiff routine to create the topographic files readable for wrf for each database.
./convert_geotiff -w 4 -t 1200 arquivoSRTM.tif
This script created automatically several binaries files and the index file bellow.
Example for SRTM 30 meter:
projection = regular_ll
known_x = 1
known_y = 18001
known_lat = -19.999722
known_lon = -47.000278
dx = 2.784729e-04
dy = 2.784729e-04
type = continuous
signed = yes
units = "NO UNITS"
description = "NO DESCRIPTION"
wordsize = 4
tile_x = 1200
tile_y = 1200
tile_z = 1
tile_bdr = 3
missing_value = 0.000000
scale_factor = 1.000000
row_order = bottom_top
endian = little
missing_value = 32768
Finally, I adapted the GEOGRID.TBL and the namelist.wps and ran successfully 3 wrf simulations using the default topographic database, SRTM, and ASTER. However, when I calculated the difference between HGT variable between the domains of 500m I find out differences in topography that reach more than 500m (my region has a complex topography with a lot of hills and valleys).
I looked at the data closely and I discovered that using the Coastline as a reference that SRTM and ASTER data has the topographic data shifted from default data and between each other.
So… Does anyone have a similar problem?
Best Regards,
Larissa
I’m having a little problem with the assimilation of topographic data in wrf.
I used as reference the discussion at the topic below and the User’s Guide to assimilate SRTM and ASTER data on WRF.
https://forum.mmm.ucar.edu/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=8359&p=14133&hilit=srtm+topography#p14133
Firstly, I downloaded several GeoTiff files for the region of my interest and merged these files using python gdal.
> gdal_merge.py -init 255 -o saida.tif carta1.tif carta2.tif carta3.tif [… até a] cartaN.tif
Then, I used the convertgeotiff routine to create the topographic files readable for wrf for each database.
./convert_geotiff -w 4 -t 1200 arquivoSRTM.tif
This script created automatically several binaries files and the index file bellow.
Example for SRTM 30 meter:
projection = regular_ll
known_x = 1
known_y = 18001
known_lat = -19.999722
known_lon = -47.000278
dx = 2.784729e-04
dy = 2.784729e-04
type = continuous
signed = yes
units = "NO UNITS"
description = "NO DESCRIPTION"
wordsize = 4
tile_x = 1200
tile_y = 1200
tile_z = 1
tile_bdr = 3
missing_value = 0.000000
scale_factor = 1.000000
row_order = bottom_top
endian = little
missing_value = 32768
Finally, I adapted the GEOGRID.TBL and the namelist.wps and ran successfully 3 wrf simulations using the default topographic database, SRTM, and ASTER. However, when I calculated the difference between HGT variable between the domains of 500m I find out differences in topography that reach more than 500m (my region has a complex topography with a lot of hills and valleys).
I looked at the data closely and I discovered that using the Coastline as a reference that SRTM and ASTER data has the topographic data shifted from default data and between each other.
So… Does anyone have a similar problem?
Best Regards,
Larissa