simaberson
New member
I am running WRF using GFS and GFSENS data boundary conditions from 2021 for the first time. I have an error in REAL that I can't explain. The rsl.out file seems fine until I get to
hydro check - should only be for isobaric input
TERRAIN_HGT_T: 25 25 0.0000000E+00
PSFC_IN, TOPO_IN: 25 25 101121.3 0.0000000E+00
PSFC extremes (new style)
3.4028235E+38 -3.4028235E+38
must have flukey situation in trad 72 1
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 3028
HOPELESS PSFC, I QUIT
-------------------------------------------
A search provides no hits for "must have flukey situation in trad" or "HOPELESS PSFC, I QUIT" except the actual code (https://github.com/jswhit/gsisrc/blob/master/get_gefs_for_regional.f90), which looking through doesn't help me figure out what is wrong.
I assume PSFC refers to that variable in the input files, which real is finding to have absolute values matching maximum floating-point values. However, when I look at PSFC in the files, it looks reasonable, and I get values from 83478 to 102545 Pa, and plots of the data look fine. I don't see any variables with TOPO, but all the surface data look fine. In fact, I went through all the data, and nothing looks odd.
So, I'm stumped. Any ideas what I am getting wrong?
Sim Aberson (sim.aberson@noaa.gov)
hydro check - should only be for isobaric input
TERRAIN_HGT_T: 25 25 0.0000000E+00
PSFC_IN, TOPO_IN: 25 25 101121.3 0.0000000E+00
PSFC extremes (new style)
3.4028235E+38 -3.4028235E+38
must have flukey situation in trad 72 1
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 3028
HOPELESS PSFC, I QUIT
-------------------------------------------
A search provides no hits for "must have flukey situation in trad" or "HOPELESS PSFC, I QUIT" except the actual code (https://github.com/jswhit/gsisrc/blob/master/get_gefs_for_regional.f90), which looking through doesn't help me figure out what is wrong.
I assume PSFC refers to that variable in the input files, which real is finding to have absolute values matching maximum floating-point values. However, when I look at PSFC in the files, it looks reasonable, and I get values from 83478 to 102545 Pa, and plots of the data look fine. I don't see any variables with TOPO, but all the surface data look fine. In fact, I went through all the data, and nothing looks odd.
So, I'm stumped. Any ideas what I am getting wrong?
Sim Aberson (sim.aberson@noaa.gov)