Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

Refining WRF Integration for Local Urban Weather Modeling: Questions on Applicability and Computational Efficiency

JasonWok

New member
I'm currently exploring the integration of WRF with a physics-based building energy model, focusing on spatial resolutions at the room scale (3 meters around).

In WRF, I've configured the finest domain with a 100-meter resolution, comprising a grid of 50 * 50 points, and the time step is set to 0.6 seconds. Additionally, I've allocated 4 computing nodes for this task.

However, I have some questions:

1. Is it appropriate to employ WRF, typically used for mesoscale weather modeling, for calculating such fine-grained outdoor urban weather conditions?

2. If WRF is indeed suitable, considering each node handles only a portion of the grid (25 * 25 points), is there a method to accelerate the computation speed, given the current wall clock speed for a time step of 0.6 seconds is 0.2 seconds, which means it takes 4 month to calculate one year simulation?

Thank you.

Related links:
1. Domain decomposition of latitude and longitude array
2. Two-way online coupling WRF.exe with my.exe
3.
 
Please see my answers below:
(1) Is it appropriate to employ WRF, typically used for mesoscale weather modeling, for calculating such fine-grained outdoor urban weather conditions?
100-m resolution enables you to run WRF in LES mode. While it is theoretically fine to run at this resolution for urban weather simulation, I am concerned that you have to run over multi-nested domains. In addition, the missing of eddy structure in the parent domain of the 100-m domain cam damage the simulation to some extent.
(2) Adaptive time step could speed up the simulation. But I am not sure whether it works fine in your case, since the time step is always very small.
 
Top