ejd_wrf_user
New member
Hi All,
I'm investigating the hydrological performance of CLMv4 using the WRF-CLM modeling suite. And, I'm running into issues with some of the variables, like the following:
The units for runoff (variable name: SRFOFF) using CLM are listed as [mm], but the values seem too small. In the land surface model code (~/WRFV3/phys/module_sf_clm.F), the variables that account for total runoff (i.e., qflx_surf, and others) have units of [mm H2O /s]. These units seem more appropriate for the values of runoff that are produced by the model. I'm curious whether the SRFOFF variable could be mislabeled.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Is this as simple as an error in unit labeling? Is there any conversion done in writing the model output? Can anyone confirm/deny my suspicions about the units?
Cheers,
EJD
I'm investigating the hydrological performance of CLMv4 using the WRF-CLM modeling suite. And, I'm running into issues with some of the variables, like the following:
The units for runoff (variable name: SRFOFF) using CLM are listed as [mm], but the values seem too small. In the land surface model code (~/WRFV3/phys/module_sf_clm.F), the variables that account for total runoff (i.e., qflx_surf, and others) have units of [mm H2O /s]. These units seem more appropriate for the values of runoff that are produced by the model. I'm curious whether the SRFOFF variable could be mislabeled.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Is this as simple as an error in unit labeling? Is there any conversion done in writing the model output? Can anyone confirm/deny my suspicions about the units?
Cheers,
EJD