Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

Verification of CONUS physics suite?

This post was from a previous version of the WRF&MPAS-A Support Forum. New replies have been disabled and if you have follow up questions related to this post, then please start a new thread from the forum home page.

R

rclare2

New member
Hello all,

WRF version 3.9 includes the use of the new "physics suite" option, conveniently providing suites of "well-tested" physics options such as "CONUS" and "TROPICAL". More here: http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wrfv3.9/updates-3.9.html

I'm having trouble finding any published work, or any documentation for that matter, which shows that the CONUS physics suite has been tested and performs well. If anyone is aware of any lit which can show that CONUS does well at certain resolutions or for certain dynamical processes, I'd really appreciate if they pointed me in that direction.
 
Hi,
Take a look at this page and see if it helps:
http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/ncar_convection_suite.php

Kelly
 
Hi, the links on this tread are not working. Does anyone have the updated links or an answer to the question asked here regarding a reference for the physics suites in WRF?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top