GlennDoodle
New member
Hi,
I keep looking at different forums and I am trying to figure out what I should use to prepare my WRF output for MET. I have tried the MET forum but haven't gotten a definitive answer...just that I need to preprocess my data. I see that some of the choices are WRF_INTERP...which I haven't successfully compiled yet (think it may have to do with my versions of netcdf), pinterp, or the UPP which is no longer supported for WRF. I read on a different post that wrf_user_vert_interp is also used for interpolation (but maybe not for MET?). Anyway, I am trying to figure out what direction I should pursue before I proceed. To add to the complexity, I intend to verify wind speed and direction which requires the wind to be put on an A-Grid and I am guessing will require the u and v to be earth relative vs. grid relative (I think). I will be veifying against point observations that have wind listed by wind speed and wind direction. Anyway, I am hoping that there is someone more familiar with the use of MET for WRF verification that can point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
Glenn
I keep looking at different forums and I am trying to figure out what I should use to prepare my WRF output for MET. I have tried the MET forum but haven't gotten a definitive answer...just that I need to preprocess my data. I see that some of the choices are WRF_INTERP...which I haven't successfully compiled yet (think it may have to do with my versions of netcdf), pinterp, or the UPP which is no longer supported for WRF. I read on a different post that wrf_user_vert_interp is also used for interpolation (but maybe not for MET?). Anyway, I am trying to figure out what direction I should pursue before I proceed. To add to the complexity, I intend to verify wind speed and direction which requires the wind to be put on an A-Grid and I am guessing will require the u and v to be earth relative vs. grid relative (I think). I will be veifying against point observations that have wind listed by wind speed and wind direction. Anyway, I am hoping that there is someone more familiar with the use of MET for WRF verification that can point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
Glenn