WRF real.exe

[Alex33]

Hello!
I am running WRF with the data from ECMWF. I ran WPS successfully, but when I ran real.exe I got this error:

metgrid input_wrf.F first_date_nml = 2018-06-01_00:00:00
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error: NetCDF: Attribute not found
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error in ext_ncd_get_dom_ti.code REAL, line 83 Element P_TOP
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error: NetCDF: Attribute not found
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error in ext_ncd_get_dom_ti.code REAL, line 83 Element GMT
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error: NetCDF: Attribute not found
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error in ext_ncd_get_dom_ti.code INTEGER, line 83 Element JULYR
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error: NetCDF: Attribute not found
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 NetCDF error in ext_ncd_get_dom_ti.code INTEGER, line 83 Element JULDAY
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 mminlu = 'USGS'
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 input_wrf.F: SIZE MISMATCH: namelist ide,jde,num_metgrid_levels= 180 142 27
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 input_wrf.F: SIZE MISMATCH: input file ide,jde,kde = 180 142 7
d01 2018-06-01_00:00:00 ---- ERROR: Mismatch between namelist and input file dimensions
NOTE: 1 namelist vs input data inconsistencies found.
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 992
NOTE: Please check and reset these options

Do you know how I can fix it?

Regards

 

[kwerner]

Hi,
It seems that you have num_metgrid_levels = 27 in your namelist.input file, but the met_em* files are only showing 7 levels of data, which doesn't seem right. Make sure the input data you are using is correct and that WPS is processing all the levels.

 

[Alex33]

Thank you so much.

I was able to successfully run the WRF model with data from the ECMWF, but when I plotted the temperature at 2 meters, some cold spots appeared and remain over time. Do you know why this happens? I think the horizontal interpolation in the METGRID.TBL is changing the results, but I'm not too sure about that.
I show the picture for 2 meter Temperature

 

[kwerner]

Hi,
I'm glad to hear you were able to get past the error and run successfully.

Since your new question is not related to the original post, please post that as a separate/new topic. This helps keep things organized for searchability and readability later. Thanks!