Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

WRFV4.6 about vortex-following

Hans

New member
Hellow
I want to figure out how to truly specify non moving domains in vortex following?
I am currently setting it up as follows:
time_to_move = 99999999,9999999,0,0,

But when I want to make some interesting attempts, it doesn't work properly:
1728961704299.png
 
When you compiled WRF, did you compile it using the 2=preset moves, or the 3=vortex following option? Can you attach your configure.wrf file, as well as namelist.input and the full WRF error log? Thanks!
 
When you compiled WRF, did you compile it using the 2=preset moves, or the 3=vortex following option? Can you attach your configure.wrf file, as well as namelist.input and the full WRF error log? Thanks!
I use 3=vortex following for compilation.

Due to the main computing resources being occupied, I have constructed a reproduction version with sufficiently low consumption.

As you can see, this is a simulation with multiple subdomains of the same level.

This alert may be a restriction added to avoid two following nest occurrences, and my main idea is to designate one of the domains as a fixed domain.

My question is how to achieve this, or how multiple nests at the same level under the following nest can cause crashes?
 

Attachments

  • 0_info.zip
    131.3 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Thanks for sending those. Unfortunately I don't think there is an existing option that will allow you to run with multiple nests (that aren't all inside one another) with the vortex-following option, regardless of whether they are static or moving. It's possible you could make some code modifications to allow for this, but that may require a lot more work than you're wanting to do.
 
Thanks for sending those. Unfortunately I don't think there is an existing option that will allow you to run with multiple nests (that aren't all inside one another) with the vortex-following option, regardless of whether they are static or moving. It's possible you could make some code modifications to allow for this, but that may require a lot more work than you're wanting to do.
Thank you for your reply. I should make relevant attempts in the future.
 
Top