Scheduled Downtime
On Friday 21 April 2023 @ 5pm MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online the morning of 24 April 2023 at the latest

Spurious waves seemingly emerging from domain boundaries - running WRF with 333 m resolution over complex terrain

Pechudin

New member
Hello WRF community,

I am new to WRF and this forum, but I believe (after some searching) that this particular question was not asked. I wish to simulate KH waves (scale of several kilometers) over some fairly complex terrain; I wish to run the model at 333 m resolution which necessitates 4 nested domains and to keep the number of points reasonable some of the domains unfortunately need to intersect complex topography.

The REAL case is for a downslope windstorm in the June of 2005, and the model gives fairly good mean wind, but after 2 days some weird instabilities occur that cover large portions of inner domains (333 m and 1 km), and seem to originate in the outer domains. The instabilities in the innermost domain have wavelengths of several km (haven't checked the outermost domains), and occurred from 12 to 18 UTC (again, in the innermost domain). Figures are attached of U10 and V10 fields at 15 UTC in several domains, as well as the terrain. I also attached namelist.wps and namelist.input files.

Domain 1 (9 km) - terrain (left) and V10m (right)
hgt_d01.pngv10_d01.png

Domain 2 (3 km) - terrain (left) and U10m (right)
hgt_d02.pngu10_d02.png

Domain 3 (1 km) - terrain (left) and V10m (right)
hgt_d03.pngv10_d03.png

Domain 4 (0.333 km) - terrain (left) and V10m (right)
hgt_d04.pngv10_d04.png

What I tried:
  • feedback = 0 and 1; found a paper that claims feedback = 0 can generate spurious waves at highest wavenumbers due to change in numerical phase speed (makes sense), however this seems to not make a difference
  • originally I wanted to use the ASTER 1' dataset in the finest domain; changing to default 30s topography in all domains did not remove the waves
  • changed dt/dx from recommended minimum 6 to 3
  • w_damping = 1 and epssm = 0.2 because I was getting vertical CFL violations in the steepest terrain
Is the issue perhaps in the boundary conditions? They seem kinda funny to my (inexperienced) eyes; I am using ERA5 reanalysis data with a refresh rate of 3 hours. Thank you in advance,

Pechudin
 

Attachments

  • namelist.input
    5.2 KB · Views: 4
  • namelist.wps
    2 KB · Views: 0
Please turn on the option diff_6th_opt (=2), which can remove small wave structure of winds.
Let me know whether this works for you.
 
Thank you for the reply, this indeed got rid of these waves in the outer two domains (d01 and d02, 9 and 3 km)! The disturbances remained in the inner two domains, but they are on the order of 5 km (NOT 2dx); and it lessened their magnitude.

It did not generate KHI in the desired area (where the measurements were taken), but perhaps this is due to insufficient vertical resolution.
 
Top